The second lecture
that comes to mind has to be about the transcendentalism. Professor Brady mentions how a
“transcendentalist is a man connected with his spiritual self and nature.” Another quote that was mentioned in this
lecture was, “man is natures masterpiece.”
I was able to vividly understand her descriptions in my head. I enjoyed when she described one of her
relatives as a transcendentalist, living in Colorado and enjoying the true
nature. This lecture stuck in my memory
because it made me wonder, do I surround myself with transcendentalists? Am I a transcendentalist? Is it better route to be a transcendentalist
and believe that “humanity cannot be whole without being connected to nature
(Brady)”? It made sense because we also
talked about how our society is being brainwashed by social media and
technology and it is forcing us to be the complete opposite of a
transcendentalist. Then I wonder, who
defines a transcendentalist? As we grew up with technology already extremely
common to have, is that the new nature? That is honestly way too much to think
about and write about, but that’s the beauty.
You never have to worry about never having enough to write about for a
paper or a pub. You will never have
trouble relating your research to examples in class because you can very easily
picture her lectures in your head.
No comments:
Post a Comment